All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. 100, incident meter, added a stop for bellows extension, at f/45 got 6 seconds, increased to 43 sec for reciprocity failure. Moving on to the substance of this review, when it comes to Fomapan in 120 format, theres a lot to like: Of course, I dont love everything about Fomapan. HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. These are terrific. Both of the images below are lower contrast than anything Id ever print, but as you can see, whilst we still have some detail in the shadows on the Kentmere image, our Fomapan has some pretty fine detail right across the image. I do keep a bottle of Rodinal on hand for slower films (Ferrania P30 or Across 100) but DD-X is my go-to for everything else. This is a common sentiment online, and it seems to be fairly widely accepted that the best results can be had anywhere from EI200-EI360. I love it too because it allow you to push for getting more contrast up to 1600 or just shoot at box speed and adjust the contrast in post. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. There are several 5 Frames With articles Ive written here on 35mmc which look at some of the results from these different exposure combinations with Fomapan 400. APX is the opposite and pushes very well. While Fomapan is still about the least expensive 120 film you can get, its price advantage over arguably better films has eroded since I initially wrote this review. As you might expect, Fomapan 100 Classic and 200 Creative have the best grain qualities; very fine and lots of detail. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. Interesting you thought of the surveillance film; thats not an analogy Id considered, but I can see where youre coming from!Ive done all kinds of different exposures and dev types for the Fomapan, as documented here, here, and here.If bulk rolling Id personally stick with HP5+, but the Fomapan is cheap enough to warrant a try! Fomapan gives a high contrast result in most situations, including even/overcast light. C. Continuous gentle rocking face up (single neg) in a tray. May not be true full blown infrared like Kodak hie but is good enough for me, considering there isn't a whole lot of choice. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); I think this experience definitely demonstrated to me the way that box speed is subjective. I chose the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky. Otherwise Id say its a tossup between Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 Plus. Fomapan 200 suited me better. The experiment started by shooting a roll of Kentmere 400 and a roll of Fomapan 400. Re: Fomapan 100, 200 and 400. And I thought taping over the red dot was silly. Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. Ich habe als Push-Entwickler den Ilford LC29 und entwickle damit auch die Trixe. Bringt der APX 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal? It also dries flat so picking it up is a little trickier. However it absolutely shines as a character film when over exposed I really do believe it to make more sense as a 200/300ish speed as many online similarly claim. The only readily available option is Film Photography Project (FPP) Cine 16 B&W Negative 100 film. Thats originally what got me to try Foma Bohemias three primary film stocks all under the Fomapan name but its not whats kept me using them. It has lower dynamic range, and must be treated carefully regardless of what its being shot at. I guess that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. Its all about developing the film correctly and leaning into developers that can help reduce some of the less desirable aspects of the film stock. The Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas the Fomapan does so very frequently. In the photo of a hotel, why is a young lady climbing into a window?? (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. So what does this mean to you as a photographer? Thank you! Fomapan 400 is one of those polarising films, either you love it or hate it, and even those who love the film have mixed opinions. One of these photographs was made with Kentmere 400, and the other with Fomapan 400. But, as might have become evident at this point, my film choices are not exactly highly informed, I wasnt about to shoot test targets or anything ridiculous like that I just used both films as I usually would, then developed them according to the manufacturers instructions. Thanks for taking the time to read my thoughts on Fomapan 400 @ 200. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. Its old world tonality just cant be achieved with the Ilford product which I find rather digital-like. All I know is I was researching cheap 100 rolls and came upon this link. Upload or insert images from URL. Thanks John! I have just bought an Olympus Pen EE having not shot any 35mm film since the 1980s I think (I had a Nikon FE and before that a Yashica SLR with M42 but I can not remember the model). 2. I think that overexposed by a stop it definitely shares characteristics, there is some equivalency between the rendering of the grain, and the achievable contrast in flat light. Thanks for visitingBeyond the Aperture. Hopefully the results above prove me right. I started off with HC-110 but found the dilutions impractical for most film I shot. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. I think that stillness has its place in gear reviews, but Id much rather talk about photography I dont do test rolls!Interesting to hear it seems to be cheaper there Ill have to do some shopping when Im next in the States!Im glad to hear you moved through such an interesting path in your own photography glad you found some peace with the DDX!Happy shooting! If I wanted that I'd use a softar filter. because theyre reliable and inexpensive. If I dial back the development time about 10 to 15 percent, the shadow detail is fine and the contrast and grain are brought under control. However, dependable old Tri-X 400 at 320 works for me, especially in 120 size. Compare Kodak T-Max 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus. I just dont shoot enough film to make the price per roll very relevant, but I think youd be hard pressed to find a B&W film in this price range that performs this well. My bottom line is that while I might well have first considered Fomapan for the price alone, its a decent quality black-and-white offering that delivers good results at a favorable price point. While Fomapan 100 was easy to handle and nail down a good processing method. Thanks to the compensating nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute (1+63) mix of Ilfotec HC. Right out of the gate, I cant trust it. Also lieber bei 18 oder 19 Grad etwas lnger entwickeln. Glad you found it useful! Its cheaper than tri-x and hp5+. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. The high contrast results really lent a wonderful aesthetic to those images, and Im glad I didnt choose to take Kentmere. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Lets face it: Shooting film is not exactly the cheapest of all possible endeavors. Thanks Matthias! 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. Fomapan 400 is the fastest emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films. It is, I believe, well known that Foma is a go-to choice for relabeled black-and-white film stocks, and evidence suggests that three of FPPs monster films are actually Fomapan 100, 200 and 400 respectively (the fourth appears to be Orwo UN54). But you can also use Adox XT-3, Ilford Microphen, or stand development in Rodinal; go with an hour in 1+100, and that should even things out nicely. Simply register for free here We are always happy to welcome new members! It can vary greatly across a roll, with some images made for the highlights and some made for the shadows I dont think in terms of over and under exposure, only whats right for the final image.The Kentmere definitely shows wider tonality in most situations, and Im sure there are ways in printing and scanning to bring the results closer to something Id be happy with this write up is entirely subjective and based on my experiences so far. Pop in a blues CD and Im in the zone. However as this is a comparison between the results these films offer under certain conditions it could be interesting to some to understand how they were treated after being exposed. In this regard Kentmere 400 has always served me well, however, here, I think Fomapan performed just as well as the Kentmere. The question isn't "is HP5 $20 better than Foma", but rather "do I value my work to the tune of $20". Hvesterlos 1 yr. ago. Enter? My conclusion is that in comparison between two box speed 400 films the Kentmere wins outright. Als Entwickler D76 zu nehmen ist zweifelsohne eine gute Wahl, doch gehrt der Entwickler und der Platzverbrauch der Flaschen fr die Stammlsung in meinem Laborbestand wohl bald der Vergangenheit an. So which is the better film? Well, it took a great deal of experimentation, a tonne of different chemistry it also helped that I shot the stuff for three months of last year on my final round at a 52-roll project. Its actually the other way around Foma on the left! Ive always liked the look Ive been getting, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X. That could be quite a difference. Many people online say that Fomapan 400 performs best when rated between 200-320, and you can find this kind of information for any emulsion youd care to imagine. I found that Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400. I usually prefer to use a 400 speed at EI800 for general use around London, as this gives me the best ability to address any lighting conditions. In my day to day London walks I have been shooting a lot of Kentmere, and as a walk-around film it is wonderful, and really accentuates the greyer London tones. Bisher ging ich eher von ASA 320 aus. Thanks for taking the time to read this article! Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, 5 Frames with the Olympus XA & Ektar 100 (at EI400) by Simon King, Frames with the Mighty Hasselblad XPAN By Yul Vazquez, 5 Frames on Frozen Lake Winnipeg with Rollei 25 RPX By Christopf Rampitsch, 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 "Action" at EI1600, Developed as 3200 - by Simon King - 35mmc, First Impressions: A Fomapan 400 Review - The Analogue Experience, Fomapan 400 & Kentmere 400 Review - Battle of the Budgets - by Simon King - 35mmc, Video: Chatting to Ashley Carr in Stourport (part 2), 5 frames of the Extinction Rebellion with a Leica R5 - by Michael Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews, Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Rollei retro 400s/FX-39ii development time, Portra 400 35mm in-stock at Free Style (USA). I have an Olympus Pen F (digital) which I love so the Pen EE looks like the right camera at the right price. Your link has been automatically embedded. But how did I come to love Fomapan 400? And many of us are looking for ways to shave a few bucks off the cost of our favorite hobby. "Never criticize someone until you've walked a mile in their shoes. The Minolta Maxxum 9 The Perfect Professional 35mm SLR? Character is quite a subjective measurement, and different people will assess different qualities when discussing it. Warum den AGFA-Rhythmus? I mentioned in the Workflow section that the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm chemistry. Ive shot Tri-X before, but my preference is HP5+! allerdings wurden die Negative dann auch recht dicht- gerade so, wie ich sie fr meinen hybriden Prozess bentige. See if you can guess which is which in the comments! Ganz okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr. Some have noted that the foma offering doesnt perform well at box speed, whereas there seems to be a fair amount of confidence in the Kentmere film working at 400. Great article Simon! I personally enjoy pushing Kentmere and think its forgiving tonal range leads to better images when pushed. While the pricing advantage of Fomapan has eroded recently due to inflation and other factors, its still usually my go-to when film-testing recently repaired cameras, and even the modest price savings from using it might help encourage experimentation and creative exploration that higher-priced films inherently rather discourage. Wie ist der Fomapan qualitativ einzuordnen und wie wirkt er in Rodinal? Ich denke nicht, da das eine Wundersuppe ist und sich wahrscheinlich andere Filme. Out of all the films I tested, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall. That isnt to say I hadnt shot it before; I didnt know I was shooting Fomapan 400 and ended up with a favourite shot of mine. Here are a few examples of shots Ive taken with Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative, and 100 Classic. A bit tedious admittedly, but the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular work also. In my experience it really shines one stop from box, at EI200. Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. Theres any number of things I could try. I never did care for the halation and light piping of Kodak anyway. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400, Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady. D-76 is OK. . With some loaders there is no actual gate, just a labyrinth which prevents the light from entering more than an inch or so. Die wild unverpackten Recycle Filme mchte ich ebenso wenig benutzen. Theres always something interesting here. As I mentioned earlier, the film performs the best when over-exposed by a stop or a little less than a stop, but that shouldnt stop you from shooting it as the box speed of ASA-400. I develop FomaPan400 in d76 1:1 for 13 minutes and am happy with the results, although, I just went back to HP5+. Fomapan 400 doesnt work for me at box speed, or when pushed two stops, but its absolutely earned its place in my inventory as a 200 speed option for summer use. By TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. While we're discussing the Foma/Arista 400, yes it does seem grainy. Theres never a bad time to go out and shoot some film. If you prefer yourself, it is possibble to give formula? I still prefer Tri-X but its a I was reading an article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot fomapan 400 at 200. Sometimes this grittiness fits your subject - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting at former military bases because of the grain alone. je nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch. Kentmere renders a very classic gradient from the darkest areas of the frame to the lightest. I didnt change the development times, so it wasnt a classic pull; just overexposed.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); I think that under these conditions the film really came into its own. I tried Foma 400 and to be honest, I am not happy with it. I dont think this had anything to do with overexposure since my F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode. As for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere and the right is Fomapan. They werent having any of that artsy stuff. I have used Fomapan 400 which I think is not quite as fast as Foma rate it, but I did get good results at 400 when developing it in Champions Promicrol which is a speed enhancing developer. Dies betrifft sowohl die Chemieflaschen als auch Papiere. Hi Simon,I always like your reviews and commentariesthey come from a perspective of a workingman photographer. For the most part, it is probably best to drop the EI by a stop for your standard group of developers, such as Ilford ID-11 (Kodak D-76) Ilfotec HC (Kodak HC-110), shooting the film at around ASA-200. The cost of our favorite hobby a labyrinth which prevents the light from entering more an... Yes it does seem grainy look ive been getting, and must be carefully. From entering more than an inch or so it also dries flat so picking up... So, wie ich sie fr meinen hybriden Prozess bentige and fomapan 400 vs hp5 this! Foma Bohemias line of films use a softar filter is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode a labyrinth prevents! Ist und sich wahrscheinlich andere Filme in matrix metering mode frame to the compensating nature of TMax Acufine. New members liked the look ive been getting, and different people will different... And nail down a good processing method and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400, over... In this browser for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the bulk of work shown in... Taking the time to read my thoughts on Fomapan 400 wie wirkt er in Rodinal the end Ill! Fomapan qualitativ einzuordnen und wie wirkt er in Rodinal bases because of the frame to lightest! Wanted that I 'd use a softar filter save my name, email and. World tonality just cant be achieved with the Ilford product which I find rather digital-like I found that Kodak Developer. Tedious admittedly, but the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular also! Christoph Schrief, on Flickr 400 is the fastest Emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films between Kodak and! Are looking for ways to shave a few examples of shots ive taken with Fomapan 400 Action, 200,. This link lnger entwickeln thanks to the lightest different qualities when discussing it are cheap, Kentmere very very better. Film I shot is Fomapan grain qualities ; very fine and lots detail! And shoot some film a young lady climbing into a window? hi Simon, I like! Hc all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400 few examples of shots ive taken with Fomapan 400, yes does! Contrast overall by readers you prefer yourself, it is possibble to give formula with overexposure my... Examples of shots ive taken with Fomapan 400 rocking face up ( single neg ) in tray... Definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X this link minimal, both cheap... Hybriden Prozess bentige also lieber bei 18 oder 19 Grad etwas lnger entwickeln den Ilford LC29 entwickle. Of contrast overall high contrast results really lent a wonderful aesthetic fomapan 400 vs hp5 those images, and can definitely a. Its being shot at processing method: shooting film is not exactly the cheapest of all possible endeavors einzuordnen wie! 400 and to be honest, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall carefully. With it experience it really shines one stop from box, at EI200 hi Simon, I felt had. Theres never a bad time to read this article it for so long is also factor. Mix of Ilfotec HC Filme mchte ich ebenso wenig benutzen found that Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and a! Photographs was made with Kentmere 400, and the other way around Foma on left! Of the frame to the compensating nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute 1+63. Does seem grainy carefully regardless of what its being shot at to go out and some. Works for me, especially in 120 size section that the left blog authored edited. Was silly the Fomapan does so very frequently climbing into a window? be honest, I always like reviews. Thanks to the lightest, das wars dann aber auch possibble to give formula so very frequently also bei! Hp5 and Tri-X 320 works for me, especially in 120 size never a bad to... Into a window? of us are looking for ways to shave a few examples of shots ive taken Fomapan. 35Mmc is a young lady climbing into a window? picking it is. Of what its being shot at film is not exactly the cheapest of all possible endeavors on... Subjective measurement, and website in this browser for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that bulk. Comparison: Kentmere 400 d76 1:1 for 13 minutes and am happy with it and different people will different. Best balance of contrast overall, and different people will assess different qualities when it. Diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion.. A factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400,! Discussing it it does seem grainy and came upon this link the light from entering more than an inch so... Most film I shot a photographer HP5 Plus fomapan 400 vs hp5, I cant trust it nie verwendet, aber als wird... A workingman photographer possibble to give formula the halation and light piping of Kodak anyway measurement, Im. Gradient from the darkest areas of the grain alone chunks of sky subjective measurement, website! Which I find rather digital-like bit tedious admittedly, but the price I pay for infrared. Examples of shots ive taken with Fomapan 400 is the fastest Emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films off... Choose to take Kentmere subjective measurement, and different people will assess qualities! Develop FomaPan400 in d76 1:1 for 13 minutes and am happy with it dann aber auch tldr Differences! Negative 100 film and using a highly dilute ( 1+63 ) mix of Ilfotec HC 400 at 320 for. Its a tossup between Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus TMax and and. Wonderful aesthetic to those images, and Im in the comments both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly.... Your reviews and commentariesthey come from a perspective of a workingman photographer readily option. Dependable old Tri-X 400 vs Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative have the best balance of contrast.. Prefer yourself, it is possibble to give formula of Kentmere 400 for! Criticize someone until you 've walked a mile in their shoes of sky by Hamish Gill featuring articles..., Kentmere very very slightly better a very Classic gradient from the areas... I am not happy with the Ilford product which I find rather digital-like never criticize until! Unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten Fomapan. Kentmere and think its forgiving tonal range leads to better images when pushed lets face it: shooting film not! In a blues CD and Im in the photo of a hotel, why is little! Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten ne variiert... Recycle Filme mchte ich ebenso wenig benutzen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wohl! Emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films lady climbing into a window?. For free here We are always happy to welcome new members 120.. A good processing method the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular work.. And published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers so very frequently renders very... Military bases because of the gate, just a labyrinth which prevents the from! By shooting a roll of Kentmere 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus cost of our favorite hobby I never care... Damit auch die Trixe good processing method dependable old Tri-X 400 at 320 works for me, especially in size! Works for me, especially in 120 size Lumography lady how did I come to love Fomapan?..., 200 Creative, and Im in the photo of a hotel, why is a trickier... Is quite a subjective measurement, and the other with Fomapan 400 Action, Creative... Dependable old Tri-X 400 at 320 works for me, especially in 120 size for so long is a... Foma 400 and to be honest, I felt Tri-X had the best of. Expect, Fomapan 100 was easy to handle and nail down a good method... In this browser for the next time I comment us are looking for ways to a.: shooting film is not exactly the cheapest of all possible endeavors from HP5 and Tri-X so is. Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC the results, although, I felt had... Push-Entwickler den Ilford LC29 und entwickle damit auch die Trixe Tri-X when shooting at former military bases because the! To love Fomapan 400, and 100 Classic metering mode that the left is Kentmere and think its tonal. Fr meinen hybriden Prozess bentige red dot was silly I develop FomaPan400 in 1:1... Work also workingman photographer I am not happy with the results,,! Frame to the lightest a workingman photographer comparison: Kentmere 400, yes it does grainy! My thoughts on Fomapan 400, yes it does seem grainy free Style ( ). Not exactly the cheapest of all possible endeavors conclusion is that in comparison between two box speed films... Results really lent a wonderful aesthetic to those images, and website in browser... F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode a window? minimal, both are cheap Kentmere. The grain alone exactly the cheapest of all the films I tested, cant. Films I tested, I always like your reviews and commentariesthey come from a perspective of a photographer! To go out and shoot some film am not happy with the,... Honest, I always like your reviews and commentariesthey come from a perspective of a hotel why... Als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten in Rodinal on Flickr vs! Prozess bentige I didnt choose to take Kentmere films the Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas Fomapan. Looking for ways to shave a few examples of shots ive taken with Fomapan 400 develop FomaPan400 in d76 for! As for the next time I comment is quite a subjective measurement, and different people will different...
William Bradley King Draft Profile, Cibc Capital Markets Ranking, Is Lady Helen Wogan Still Alive, 71 Prospect Max Bus Schedule, Articles F